Have you ever come across the poem by Rupert Brooke, The Soldier? It starts:
If I should die, think only this of me: That there's some corner of a foreign field That is for ever England.
In view of Queen’s Elizabeth’s death and the legacy of her remarkable reign, it got me focused on the topic of what remains after we’re gone. What comes to mind when you think about your legacy?
Not yet!
Crazy idea!
Fuzzy
Super clear!
Or something else? May I ask you to add in your thoughts below!
DIALOGOS - Meaningful Conversation is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
I was talking with a writer friend about this yesterday. He wanted to refocus his purpose with his writing.
I told him writing, and more specifically, publishing, is all about ego. He argued that he has selfless reasons, like contributing to the substance of the universe. I told him that assuming you have something unique to contribute is inherently egotistical (even if you’re right).
Putting things out there to continue your legacy, so that you’re not forgotten, or even to contribute to the cultural zeitgeist and narrative, is an act of ego and also a crapshoot, as (like with so many things) one’s chance of being actually remembered, especially beyond the few family members who knew you or knew someone who did, is so small.
Anyway. As for my own legacy (not that people will remember me anyway) I’d like to be remembered as a person of compassion and curiosity, someone who would listen and talk and be present for who you are and not who I wish you were.
As I see many friends and family members battling illness right now, I am even more acutely reminded of my relative smallness and the depressing futility of it all. I wrote in a notebook yesterday, depressed about a very young friend’s diagnosis/prognosis, “Why bother?”
The answer came back very clearly: “Because the rest of us are still here.”
Have you ever thought about your own legacy?
I was talking with a writer friend about this yesterday. He wanted to refocus his purpose with his writing.
I told him writing, and more specifically, publishing, is all about ego. He argued that he has selfless reasons, like contributing to the substance of the universe. I told him that assuming you have something unique to contribute is inherently egotistical (even if you’re right).
Putting things out there to continue your legacy, so that you’re not forgotten, or even to contribute to the cultural zeitgeist and narrative, is an act of ego and also a crapshoot, as (like with so many things) one’s chance of being actually remembered, especially beyond the few family members who knew you or knew someone who did, is so small.
Anyway. As for my own legacy (not that people will remember me anyway) I’d like to be remembered as a person of compassion and curiosity, someone who would listen and talk and be present for who you are and not who I wish you were.
As I see many friends and family members battling illness right now, I am even more acutely reminded of my relative smallness and the depressing futility of it all. I wrote in a notebook yesterday, depressed about a very young friend’s diagnosis/prognosis, “Why bother?”
The answer came back very clearly: “Because the rest of us are still here.”
Funny you should ask! I just wrote about this very notion in my last post... https://arrivalsanddepartures.substack.com/p/capturing-her-in-one-sentence
What is this white supremacy?